What Is the “Burden of Proof” in My Civil Case?

Attorney Blog

undefinedMany people believe that, simply because they are injured as result of another’s negligence, they are entitled to any and all medical treatment they receive for any injury that may develop after the accident. However, simply being involved in an accident does not ensure that you will recover damages against a third person or entity. A plaintiff has to show by a preponderance of the evidence not only that the third party was negligent, but also that this negligence was the proximate cause of their injury. This is what is called the burden of proof.

A plaintiff always has the burden of proving their case at trial. Preponderance of the evidence is a fancy way of saying that a given proposition is more probably true than not. Essentially, you need to show that the crucial issues/elements of your case are in your favor by more than 50%. Contrast this with the burden that a prosecutor has in a criminal trial, beyond a reasonable doubt. To be sure, this is a much higher burden to meet and is not required for civil trials.  What is the reason for a different standard? The stakes are much higher in a criminal case where someone’s freedom is at stake. However, it is important that jurors understand the difference in a civil case so that they are not holding plaintiffs to the much higher standard which, quite frankly, would be difficult to overcome in a civil case where people often have preexisting conditions or prior injuries to the same body part.

In Illinois, a plaintiff must only show that the accident was a contributing factor in the resulting injury. Thus, if the accident was at least a 1% cause of the injury, it is sufficient to establish proximate cause.  How does this work when I said earlier that the burden is more than 50%? Well, you need to show that it is more probably true than not that the accident was at least a contributing factor in causing the injury. If you meet that burden, you win. This is of utmost importance when you have an injury to a body part for which you had already received treatment in the past or for which you have an underlying degenerative condition.

Simply put, explaining the burden of proof to a jury is not easy, especially the way in which TV shows and movies have skewed the general public’s view. Seasoned trial lawyers understand the way in which the burden of proof must be explained to a jury and to ensure that jurors do not confuse it with the much higher criminal standard.

Categories:

Very satisfied

Very satisfied.     – Maricela M.

DJ (Dexter Evans) was amazing.

DJ (Dexter Evans) was amazing. He and Kylene communicated well and reached out often. This is my 2nd time using him and will never go anywhere else for my attorney needs. – Shanita S.

Highly recommended!

Highly recommended! Smooth process and great communication. Two thumbs up!   – Marek P.    

Big thank you to Attorney DJ Evans

Big thank you to Attorney DJ Evans for helping me with my PI case. Had a terrible car accident which I was not at fault for legally but my car was totaled and I sustained injuries that impacted my work. The at faults insurance tried to manipulate me into taking 2k which was ridiculous for […]

Jay Johnson was fabulous

Jay Johnson was fabulous, he kept me up-to-date and informed of every step. Very happy with his service and I would highly recommend him.       – Dawn S.  

Very helpful.

Very helpful. I was able to put most of it away into an emergency fund.         – Christine S.

Got a Settlement Quicker Than I Expected and Better Than I Expected!

My second time with Leandro A. at Woodruff Johnson and Evans. Another great job. Didn’t have to talk with work comp at all this time since I told work comp I don’t trust them after the first occurrence with them. Got a settlement quicker than I expected and better than I expected. Thanks to Leandro […]

Attorney Dexter Evans: Professional, Responsive and Took Care of Business. Highly Recommended. You Will Not Be Disappointed!

Dexter Evans handled my case for a motor vehicle incident. I would like to inform you that he was very professional, responsive, and took care of business. Whenever I had a question they were very quick to respond and handled everything for me. If it wasn’t Dexter then Nicole was right there. I highly recommend […]

Go to the Doctor. Do the Tests. Get the Diagnostics. Hire Leandro Alhambra!

Leandro Alhambra took on my workman’s comp case and did a great job getting a good return back. I had him take on the case late (2 years after the incident) and he still was able to provide a good amount of compensation. Advice to anyone reading: go to the doctor, do the tests and […]

Leandro A. Alhambra Fights to Get Every Dollar for his Clients

I used Leandro A. Alhambra for my workmans comp. case. I see in him that he fights to get every dollar for his clients to be satisfied of the outcome.

View All Testimonials

Get Your Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields