Impairment Ratings Are Not Mandatory

Attorney Blog

As part of the 2011 workers’ compensation reforms, employers pushed through changes to the workers’ compensation laws that they said would bring cost savings to the system.  What many of these changes really were designed to do was to decrease the amount of benefits workers would receive for work related injuries.  One of the changes employers welcomed was the inclusion of impairment ratings to the list of factors a workers’ compensation Arbitrator considers when awarding damages to an injured worker.  However, nowhere was it specifically written in the law that these ratings were mandatory.

Under Illinois law, injured workers are entitled to receive money damages to compensate them for their permanent injuries.  In Illinois, we call this permanent partial disability or PPD.  PPD is a percent loss of use of the injured body part.  PPD is not the same as impairment ratings.

Impairment ratings also give a percent number just like PPD.  However, impairment percentages are almost always substantially lower than PPD percentages.  That is why employers love impairment ratings.  That is why employers want them to be mandatory.  Impairment ratings are calculated by a physician who performs a medical examination after an injured worker has reached maximum medical improvement and then follows guidelines authored by the American Medical Association to arrive at a percentage number.  This process is very formulaic and does not leave much room for an Arbitrator to consider how an injury truly affects an injured person.  Physicians charge money for this exam.

PPD percentages, on the other hand, do consider how an injury truly affects a person.  Prior to 2011, Arbitrators never had to consider impairment ratings.  Since September 1, 2011, the Workers’ Compensation Act says that Arbitrators shall consider five factors when making their determination as to what an injured worker is entitled to receive for his permanent injuries.  These five factors include a person’s age at the time of the accident, the person’s future earning capacity, the occupation of the person, the severity of the person’s injury as corroborated by medical records, and an impairment rating.  The law states that no one factor shall be the sole or primary determinative factor in calculating PPD.

Employers argued that such impairment ratings were now mandatory.  Employers hoped that if impairment ratings were mandatory, employees would be discouraged from filing claims because of the costs associated with an impairment rating and the decreased percent numbers associated with impairment ratings.

First, employers argued that it was an injured employee’s responsibility to get such an impairment rating report.  The Illinois Appellate Court disagreed.  The Appellate Court decided that an employee does not have to submit an impairment rating before an Arbitrator can consider what to award for permanent injuries.  Employers next argued that if an employee did not submit an impairment rating, the court still had to consider an impairment rating from any source.  It was argued that if no impairment rating existed, the workers’ compensation Arbitrator could not make any award to compensate an injured employee for permanent injuries.  Again, the Illinois Appellate Court disagreed.  The Illinois Appellate Court decided that there is no requirement that either party, employee or employer, submit an impairment rating.  If no impairment rating is submitted, the Arbitrator simply has to consider the other four factors.

Both of these decisions are welcome news to employees.  Employees will not be burdened with the cost of obtaining reports that are designed to do nothing more than drive down the value of their claim.  If neither side submits a report, the workers’ compensation Arbitrator is free to consider the other four factors and still award injured workers rightful compensation for their work related injuries.  One question remains… Can employers force employees to submit to an impairment rating exam?  The Illinois Appellate Court has not yet answered that question.  Stay tuned.

Learn more about the author here. 

Categories:

Highly recommended!

Highly recommended! Smooth process and great communication. Two thumbs up!   – Marek P.   […]

Big thank you to Attorney DJ Evans

Big thank you to Attorney DJ Evans for helping me with my PI case. Had a terrible car accident which I was not at fault for legally but my car was totaled and I sustained injuries that impacted my work. The at faults insurance tried to manipulate me into taking 2k which was ridiculous for […]

Jay Johnson was fabulous

Jay Johnson was fabulous, he kept me up-to-date and informed of every step. Very happy with his service and I would highly recommend him.       – Dawn S. […]

Very helpful.

Very helpful. I was able to put most of it away into an emergency fund.         – Christine […]

Got a Settlement Quicker Than I Expected and Better Than I Expected!

My second time with Leandro A. at Woodruff Johnson and Evans. Another great job. Didn’t have to talk with work comp at all this time since I told work comp I don’t trust them after the first occurrence with them. Got a settlement quicker than I expected and better than I expected. Thanks to Leandro […]

Attorney Dexter Evans: Professional, Responsive and Took Care of Business. Highly Recommended. You Will Not Be Disappointed!

Dexter Evans handled my case for a motor vehicle incident. I would like to inform you that he was very professional, responsive, and took care of business. Whenever I had a question they were very quick to respond and handled everything for me. If it wasn’t Dexter then Nicole was right there. I highly recommend […]

Go to the Doctor. Do the Tests. Get the Diagnostics. Hire Leandro Alhambra!

Leandro Alhambra took on my workman’s comp case and did a great job getting a good return back. I had him take on the case late (2 years after the incident) and he still was able to provide a good amount of compensation. Advice to anyone reading: go to the doctor, do the tests and […]

Leandro A. Alhambra Fights to Get Every Dollar for his Clients

I used Leandro A. Alhambra for my workmans comp. case. I see in him that he fights to get every dollar for his clients to be satisfied of the […]

Their Office Represented Me Very Well

I felt that their office represented me very well with a very difficult people to deal with. The process took a long time but at the end they were able to close the deal. I want to thank you for the support and ability to answer any and all questions I had during this process. […]

Attorney Leandro “Lee” Alhambra has given me and my family a peace of mind that I am much grateful for.

My experience with Woodruff Johnson & Evans has been a blessing. My attorney Lee has been such a professional but also a friend that has walked me through many of the things that I had no knowledge of or what I should do next. He has given me and my family a peace of mind […]

View All Testimonials

Get Your Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.